Núm. 12 (2022): Patrimonio cultural: miradas sobre su conformación
Aportes

Descodificar el patrimonio

PDF
  • Nonofho Mathibidi Ndobochani

Publicado 2023-09-30

Palabras clave

  • patrimonio, arqueología, uso del patrimonio, presentación del patrimonio, apropiación del patrimonio.

Cómo citar

Descodificar el patrimonio. (2023). Antropología. Revista Interdisciplinaria Del INAH, 12, 148-159. https://revistas.inah.gob.mx/index.php/antropologia/article/view/19879

Resumen

El avance del patrimonio hacia una culminación de procesos de pensamiento y enfoques metodológicos de los que disponemos hasta la fecha es elocuente. En gran medida, el desarrollo del patrimonio se ha visto influido por la disciplina arqueológica, de la que tanto se ha apropiado y que tenía tendencia a considerar el pasado como algo “ajeno”, en contraposición a una “herencia”. Por lo tanto, a estas alturas es probablemente correcto que tengamos filosofías diversas sobre lo que debe valorarse como patrimonio. Deberíamos debatir y escribir libremente sobre si existe un equilibrio (si todos tenemos voz) en nuestra representación del patrimonio. En las últimas décadas hemos asistido a debates pragmáticos sobre la naturaleza del patrimonio como fenómeno geográfica y conceptualmente global. Por tanto, el patrimonio se ha definido de forma diferente y se ha redefinido, estructurado y reestructurado, conceptualizado y reconceptualizado continuamente. Esto ha dado lugar a una serie de nociones que influyen en la investigación, la conservación, el consumo y la presentación del patrimonio.

PDF

Descargas

Los datos de descarga todavía no están disponibles.

Referencias

  1. ALLEN, Tom (2013), “Legal principles, political processes, and cultural property”, en Geoffrey SCARRE y Robin CONINGHAM (eds), Appropriating the past: Philosophical perspectives on the practice of archaeology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 239-256.
  2. ANDERSON, Samuel D. (2020), “The French Médersa in West Africa: Modernizing Islamic Education and Institutionalizing Colonial Racism, 1890s-1920s”, Islamic Africa, vol. 11, núm. 1, pp. 42-70.
  3. BEACH, David (1998), “Cognitive archaeology and imaginary history at Great Zimbabwe”, Current Anthropology, vol. 39, núm. 1, pp. 47-72.
  4. BINFORD, Lewis R. (1962), “Archaeology as anthropology”, American Antiquity, vol. 28, núm. 2, pp. 217-225.
  5. BLENCH, Roger (2001), “You can’t go home again”: Pastoralism in the new millennium, Londres, Overseas Development Institute.
  6. BRANDS, Henry W. (2002), The reckless decade: America in the 1890s, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  7. BUDGE, Ernest Alfred W. (1902), A history of Egypt from the end of the Neolithic Period to the death of Cleopatra VII, BC 30: Egypt under the Amenemhats and Hyksos (Vol. 3), Oosterhout, Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner & Company, Limited.
  8. CHAPMAN, Ellen (2008), “Community, heritage, identity: Constructing, performing and consuming Welsh identities in the US”, tesis, Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle University.
  9. CHAPMAN, William (1989), “The organizational context in the history of archaeology: Pitt Rivers and other British archaeologists in the 1860s”, The Antiquaries Journal, vol. 69, núm. 1, pp. 23-42.
  10. CHIPPINDALE, Christopher (1993), “Discrepancy, consumption: the intellectual background to a post-processual archaeology”, en Norman YOFFEE y Andrew SHERRATT (eds.), Archaeological theory: Who sets the agenda?, Oxford, University of Oxford, pp. 27-36.
  11. _____ (2005), “Colleagues, talking, writing, publishing”, en Handbook of archaeological methods II, Lanham, Altamira Press, pp. 1339-1371.
  12. CHIRIKURE, Shadreck (2019), “New perspectives on the political economy of Great Zimbabwe”, Journal of Archaeological Research, núm. 28, pp. 139-186.
  13. CHIRIKURE, Shadreck, e Innocent PIKIRAYI (2008), “Inside and outside the dry stone walls: Revisiting the material culture of Great Zimbabwe”, Antiquity, vol. 82, núm. 318, pp. 976-993.
  14. CHIRIKURE, Shadreck, Munyaradzi MANYANGA, Webber NDORO, y Gilbert PWITI (2010), “Unfulfilled promises? Heritage management and community participation at some of Africa’s cultural heritage sites”, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 16, núm. 1-2, pp. 30-44.
  15. FAGAN, Brian (2005), “Short history of archaeological methods, 1870 to 1960”, en Herbert D. G. MASCHNER y Christopher CHIPPINDALE (eds.), Handbook of archaeological methods, Lanham, AltaMira Press.
  16. FERRE, John P. (1988), “The dubious heritage of media ethics: Cause-and-effect criticism in the 1890s”, American Journalism, vol. 5, núm. 4, pp. 191-203.
  17. FONTEIN, Joost (2006) “Silence, destruction and closure at Great Zimbabwe: Local narratives of desecration and alienation”, Journal of Southern African Studies, vol. 32, núm. 4, pp. 771-794.
  18. _____ (2016), The silence of Great Zimbabwe: Contested landscapes and the power of heritage, Londres, Routledge.
  19. FRY, Caroline (1828), The scripture reader’s guide to the devotional use of the Holy Scriptures, Londres, James Nisbet, <https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/107097>, consultada el 13 de octubre de 2021.
  20. HALL, Richard N. (1905), “Stone fort and pits on the Inyanga Estate, Rhodesia”, The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, vol. 35, pp. 92-102.
  21. HARRISON, Rodney (2010), “What is heritage”, Understanding the politics of heritage, Mánchester, Manchester University Press, pp. 5-42.
  22. HAYES, Kelly E. (2008), “Book review: Black Atlantic religion: Tradition, transnationalism, and matriarchy in the Afro-Brazilian Candomblé by J. Lorand Matory”, History of Religions, vol. 48, núm. 2, pp. 170-173.
  23. _____ (2009), “Defining the ‘Negro Problem’ in Brazil: The Shifting Significance of Brazil’s African Heritage from the 1890s to the 1940s”, en Edward E.
  24. CURTIS (ed.), The new black gods, Indiana, Indiana University Press, pp. 209-225.
  25. HISTORICAL THESAURUS (2023), Historical Thesaurus, Oxford English Dictionary, <https://www.oed.com/thesaurus>, consultada el 10 de febrero de 2023.
  26. HODDER, Ian (1985), “Postprocessual archaeology”, en Michael B. SCHIFFER (ed.), Advances in archaeological method and theory. Volume 8, Londres, Elsevier, pp. 1-26.
  27. _____ (1991), “Postprocessual archaeology and the current debate”, en Robert W. PREUCEL (ed.), Processual and postprocessual archaeologies: multiple ways of knowing the past, Carbondale, Southern Illinois University-Centre for Archaeolofical Investigations (Occasional Paper No. 10), pp. 30-41.
  28. _____ (2014) [1991], “Preface”, en Ian HODDER (ed.), Archaeological theory in Europe: The last three decades, Londres, Routledge, pp. VII-XI.
  29. JOHNSON, Samuel (1775), Taxation no tyranny: an answer to the resolutions and address of the American congress, <https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/107097>, consultada el 13 de octubre de 2021.
  30. JOURNAL COMPARATIVE LEGISLATION & INTERNATIONAL LAW (1923), Journal Comparative Legislation & International Law, vol. 5, núm. 1, p. 134.
  31. KALMAN, Harold (2014), Heritage planning: Principles and process, Londres, Routledge.
  32. KALMAN, Harold, y Marcus R. LÉTOURNEAU (2020), Heritage planning: principles and process, Londres, Routledge.
  33. KIBRIA, Nazli (1996), “Not Asian, black or white? Reflections on South Asian American racial identity”, Amerasia Journal, vol. 22, núm. 2, pp. 77-86.
  34. KING, LaGarrett J. (2014), “When lions write history: Black history textbooks, African-American educators, & the alternative black curriculum in social studies education, 1890-1940”, Multicultural Education, vol. 22, núm. 1, pp. 2-11.
  35. KUSHNER, Toney (2012), “Heritage and ethnicity: An introduction”, en Toney KUSHNER (ed.), The Jewish heritage in British history: Englishness and Jewishness, Londres, Routledge, pp. 5-28.
  36. LEE, Christopher (1999), “Introduction [to Turning the century: writing of the 1890s]”, en Christoper LEE (ed.), Turning the century: writing of the 1890s, St. Lucia, University of Queensland Press, pp. XI-XXVIII.
  37. LOWENTHAL, David (2005), “Natural and cultural heritage”, International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 11, núm. 1, pp. 81-92.
  38. LUBBOCK, John (1870), The origin of civilization and the primitive condition of man: Mental and social condition of savages, Nueva York, D. Appleton, <http://online.canadiana.ca/view/oocihm.33074>, consultada el 10 de febrero de 2023).
  39. LYSSAKOV, Pavel V. (1998), Gogol and the Russian literary mind: 1890s-1930s, Nueva York, Columbia University.
  40. MÅRDH, Hedvig (2017), “A century of Swedish Gustavian style: Art history, cultural heritage and neoclassical revivals from the 1890s to the 1990s”, tesis de doctorado, Uppsala, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis.
  41. MILLER, Patrick (2005), “Melbourne’s main outfall sewer: An engineering achievement of the 1890s”, Australian Journal of Multi-Disciplinary Engineering, vol. 3, núm. 1, pp. 51-56.
  42. NAGAOKA, Masanori (2014), “Community-centered landscapes protection at Borobudur, Indonesia”, en Heritage and Landscapes as Human Values, UNESCO Conference Proceedings, Theme 4, Community Driven Conservation and Local Empowerment, París, UNESCO, pp. 498-504.
  43. NDOBOCHANI, Nonofho (2009), “Incorporating community cultural values in archaeological impact assessment processes: Dikgatlhong Dam and Dukwe/Mowana Mine Projects, Botswana”, M. Phil dissertation, Gaborone, University of Botswana.
  44. _____ (2016), “An appraisal of the development of archaeological legislation in Botswana, 1911-2011: A 100-year Journey”, Botswana Notes and Records, núm. 48, pp. 36-47.
  45. NDORO, Webber (2001), Your monument our shrine: The preservation of Great Zimbabwe, Uppsala, Department of Archaeology and Ancient History, Uppsala University.
  46. PIKIRAYI, Innocent (2009), The silence of Great Zimbabwe: Contested landscapes and the power of heritage, by Joost Fontein, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  47. PIKIRAYI, Innocent, y Shadreck CHIRIKURE (2011), “Debating Great Zimbabwe”, Azania: Archaeological Research in Africa, vol. 46, núm. 2, pp. 221-231.
  48. RANDALL-MACIVER, David (1933), “Archaeology as a science”, Antiquity, vol. 7, núm. 25, pp. 5-20.
  49. RIEGER, Bernhard (2003), “‘Modern wonders’: Technological innovation and public ambivalence in Britain and Germany, 1890s to 1933”, History Workshop Journal, vol. 55, núm. 1, pp. 152-176.
  50. RYCROFT, David (1991), “Black South African urban music since the 1890’s: Some reminiscences of Alfred Assegai Kumalo (1879-1966)”, African Music: Journal of the International Library of African Music, vol. 7, núm. 1:, pp. 5-32.
  51. SCHIFFER, Michael B. (1975), “Archaeology as behavioral science”, American Anthropologist, vol. 77, núm. 4, pp. 836-848.
  52. _____ (1988), “The structure of archaeological theory”, American Antiquity, vol. 53, núm. 3, pp. 461-485.
  53. SMITH, Claire, y H. Martin WOBST (2004), “Decolonizing archaeological theory and practice”, en Claire SMITH y H. Martin WOBST (eds.), Indigenous archaeologies. Decolonising theory and practice, Londres, Routledge, pp. 4-14.
  54. SMITH, Michael G. (1957), “The African heritage in the Caribbean”, en Vera RUBIN (ed.), Caribbean studies: A symposium, Saint Andrew, Institute of Social and Economic Research, University College of the West Indies, pp. 34-36.
  55. SULLY, Dean (2007), Decolonizing conservation: Caring for Maori meeting houses outside New Zealand, Walnut Creek, Left Coast Press.
  56. TERIBA, Adedoyin (2017), “Afro-Brazilian architecture in Southwest Colonial Nigeria (1890s-1940s)”, tesis de doctorado, Princeton, Princeton University.
  57. TOMLAN, Michael A. (2015), “The 1970s: A decade of pivotal change in preservation. European architectural heritage year and heritage politics in the United States”, Monumenta, núm. 3, pp. 403-413.
  58. TOMORROW WORLD (1922), The World Tomorrow, vol. V, núm. 3, <https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/107097>, consultada el 13 de octubre de 2021.
  59. TYLOR, Edward B. (1871), Primitive culture: Researches into the development of mythology, philosophy, religion, art and custom, Londres, J. Murray, <https://www.oed.com/view/Entry/10286>, consultada el 13 de octubre de 2021.
  60. WATKINS, Joe, y T. J. FERGUSON (2005), “Working with and working for Indigenous communities”, en Herbert D. G. MASCHNER y Christopher CHIPPINDALE (eds.), Handbook of archaeological methods, vol. 2, Rowman, Altamira Press, pp. 1372-1406.
  61. WHEWELL, William (1859), History of the inductive sciences: from the earliest to the present times, vol. I., Nueva York, D. Appleton.
  62. WILSON, Daniel (1863), Prehistoric Annals of Scotland, Volume 1, Issue 53925 of CIHM/ICMH microfiche series, Prehistoric annals of Scotland, <https://books.google>, consultada el 13 de octubre de 2021.
  63. WOBST, H. Martin (1983), “We can’t see the forest for the trees: sampling and the shapes of archaeological distributions”, en James A. MOORE y Arthur S. KEENE (eds.), Archaeological hammers and theories, Londres, Elsevier / Archetype, pp. 37-85.
  64. _____ (2004), “Power to the (Indigenous) past and present! Or: the theory and method behind archaeological theory and method”, en Claire SMITH y H. Martin WOBST (eds.), Indigenous archaeologies, Londres, Routledge, pp. 15-29.
  65. WYATT-BROWN, Bertram (2001), The shaping of Southern culture: Honor, grace, and war, 1760s-1890s, Chapel Hill / Londres, University of North Carolina Press Books.
  66. WYLIE, Alison (1993), “A proliferation of new archaeologies: ‘beyond objectivism and relativism’”, en Norman YOFFEE y Andrew SHERRATT, Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 20-26.
  67. YOFFEE, Norman (1993), “Too many chiefs? (or, safe texts for the ‘90s)”, en Norman YOFFEE y Andrew SHERRATT, Archaeological theory: who sets the agenda, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 60-78.