Consensos y paradojas en el arte de la frontera entre México y Estados Unidos

Abstract

The strategies and practices to represent reality in art, as well as the concept of border, have changed throughout history. This article presents a descriptive critical analysis of the consensuses and paradoxes in the narratives of three art projects on the topic of the border between Mexico and the United States. To do this, the assumptions of Gilberto Giménez and Jacques Rancière are retaken, the ways in which artists influence viewers, either as individual or collective identities, in terms of the representational regime of the way of seeing or doing, being together or apart. , in front or in the middle, inside or outside, under the assumption of the concept of border in art.