Descripción y clasificación del sistema de parentesco del totonaco de la costa de Papantla, Veracruz
Keywords:
Antropología física, Cultura totonaca, Papantla, VeracruzAbstract
-
Downloads
References
Censo General de Población, 1990.
A.L. Kroeber, «Classificatory Systems of Relationship», The Nature of Culture, the University of Chicago Press, Londres 1909 y Chicago 1952, pp. 175-181.
F.G. Lounsbury, «A Formal Account of the Crow and Omaha Type Kinship Terminologies», W.H. Goodenough (Ed.), Explorations in Cultural Antrhopology, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1964, pp. 212-255.
Francisco Barriga Puente, «La terminología del parentesco de San Antonio Enchisi», Coloquio Jakobson. La imaginación y la inteligencia en el lenguaje, INAH, México, (en prensa).
Ward H. Goodenough, «Componential Analysis and the Study of Meaning» en Lantuate núm. 32, 1956, pp. 195-216.
Joseph H. Greenberg, «Universals of Kinship Terminology», Language Universals with Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies, Mouton, The Hague, 1966, pp. 72-87.
R.H. Lowie,«Relationship Temes», Enciclopedia Británica, 14 ed. vol XIX, Helen Hemingway Benton Publisher, Chicago (1929) 1946, pp. 84-89.
G. P. Murdok, Social structure, The Free Press, New York, 1965.
William Croft, Typology and Universals, Cambridge University press, Cambridge, New York, Part Chester, Melbourne, Sydney, 1990.
Joseph H. Greenberg, Lenguage Universals with special reference tofeature hierarchies, Janua linguarum, Series Minor, 59, Mouton, The Hague, 166.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1995 Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nc/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.