Cuestiones tipológicas de transitividad
Palabras clave:
Lingüística, transitividad, tipología lexicalResumen
Una lengua, "como un todo", puede diferir de otra en el nivel de transitividad verbal lexicalizada. Por ejemplo, en algunas lenguas la mayoría de raíces verbales pueden ser intransitivas y sólo unas cuantas son verdaderamente transitivas. En otras, la mayoría de verbos pueden ser lábiles y muy pocos pueden estar especificados para una transitividad fija o lexicalizada. Este trabajo propone una tipología de la transitividad lexical, sugiriendo que hay por lo menos cuatro perfiles. En el Tipo 1, la transitividad de las rai?ces y bases es altamente lexicalizada, con categorías bien ni?tidas. El Tipo 2 tiene transitividad lexicalizada, pero graduable. En el Tipo 3, las raíces tienen transitividad sobre-especificada. Finalmente, el Tipo 4 tiene raíces sobre-especificadas, pero requiere bases especificadas.
Descargas
Citas
Artawa, I. Ketut, Ergativity and Balines Syntax, Yakarta, Badan Penyelenggara (NUSA, Linguistic Studies of Indonesian and Other Languages in Indonesia, 42, 43, 44), 1988.
Boas, Hans, “Frame Semantics as a Framework for Describing Polysemy and Syntactic Structures of English and German Motion Verbs in Contrastive Computational Lexicography”, en Paul Ryson et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the Corpus Linguistics 2001 Conference. Technical Papers, vol. 13, Lancaster, University Centre for Computer Corpus Research on Language (http://framenet.icsi.berkeley.edu/papers/boasCL2001.pdf).
Carlson, Robert, “Event-Views and Tansitivity in the Supyire Verbal System”, en Gur Papers/Cahiers Voltaïques, núm. 5, 2000, pp. 39-58.
Fillmore, Charles y B. Atkins, “Toward a Frame-Based Lexicon: The Semantics of RISK and its Neighbors”, en A. Lehrer y E. Kittay (eds.), Frame, Fields, and Contrasts: New Essays in Semantic and Lexical Organization, Hillsdale, Erlbaum, pp. 75-102.
Friesen, Dianne, “Moloko Grammar” (mecanoescrito), s.f.
Garland, Jennifer, “Morphological Typology and the Complexity of Nominal Morphology in Sinhala”, en Robert Englebretson y Carol Genetti (eds.), Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, núm. 17, Santa Barbara, University of California, 2006, pp. 1-19.
Goldberg, Adele, A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1995.
Hale, Ken, “Basic Word Order in Two ‘Free Word Order’ Languages”, en Doris L. Payne (ed.), Pragmatics of Word Order Flexibility, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1992, pp. 63-82.
Hopper, Paul y Sandra Thompson, “Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse”, en Language, núm. 56, 1980, pp. 251-299.
Jackendoff, Ray, Semantic Structures, Cambridge, mit Press, 1990.
Jany, Carmen, “The Relationship Between Case Marking and S, A, and O in Spoken Sinhala”, en Robert Englebretson y Carol Genetti (eds.), Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics, núm. 17, Santa Barbara, University of California, 2006, pp. 68-84.
Johnson, Christopher y Charles Fillmore, “The FameNet Tagset for Frame-Semantic and Syntactic Coding of Predicate-Argument Structure”, ponencia para la 6th Applied Natural Language Processing Conference, 29 de abril-4 de mayo, Seattle, Washington, 2000, pp. 56-62.
Masica, Colin, The Indo-Aryan Languages, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1991.
Nordlinger, Rachel, Constructive Case. Evidence from Australian Languages, Stanford, CSLI Publications, 1998.
Öztürk, Balkiz, Case, Referentiality, and Phrase Structure, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2005.
Payne, Doris L., “Degrees of Inherent Transitivity in Yagua Verbs”, en International Journal of American Linguistics, núm. 51, 1985, pp. 19-37.
“Nonconfigurationality and Discontinuous Expressions in Panare”, en David Peterson (ed.), Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Berkeley, University of California, 1993, pp. 121-138.
“The Maasai External Possessor Construction”, en Joan Bybee, John Haiman y Sandra Thompson (eds.), Essays on Language Function and Language Type, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1997a, pp. 395-422.
“Semantic Role and Argument Structure in the Maasai ‘External Possession’ Construction”, en Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 1997b, Berkeley, University of California, pp. 98-115.
“A Frame Semantics Approach to Lexemic Structure: Uncovering the Truth about Maa a-sip”, en Journal of African Languages and Linguistic, núm. 22, 2001a, pp. 145-168.
“The Explanation of Argument Structure: Lexicalization or Discourse Use?”, en Proceedings of the Seoul International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics, Seúl, Korean Society of Discourse and Cognition, 2001b, pp. 532-556.
“How to Develop a New Intransitive: The Story of Maa sip ‘Make Smooth, Lick Clean, Bless, Kill, Tell the Truth’, and ‘Be Certain’”, Proceedings of the Seoul International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics, Seúl, Korean Society of Discourse and Cognition, 2001c, pp. 339-362.
“Is Possession Mere Location? Contrary Evidence from Maa (Maasai)”, en William McGregor (ed.), Possession, Berlín, Mouton dee Gruyter, 2009.
Payne, Doris L., Mitsuyo Hamaya y Peter Jacobs, “Active, Passive, and Inverse in Maasai”, en T. Givón (ed.), Voice in Discourse, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 1994.
Payne, Doris L. y Thomas E. Payne, “Yagua”, en Desmond Derybshire y Geoffrey Pullum (eds.), Handbook of Amazonian Languages 2, Berlín, Mouton de Gruyter, 1990, pp. 249-474.
Payne, Thomas E., “The Pragmatics of Voice in a Philippine language: Actor-Focus and Goal-Focus in Cebuano Narrative”, en T. Givón (ed.), Voice and Inversion, Amsterdam/Philadelphia, John Benjamins (Typological Studies in Language, vol. 28), 1994, pp. 317-364.
Reed, Irene et al., Yup’ik Eskimo Grammar, Fairbanks, Alaska Native Languages Center/Yup’ik Language Workshop-University of Alaska, 1977.37 Cuestiones tipológic as de l atr ansiti vidad
Slobin, Dan, “How People Move: Discourse Effects of Linguistic Typology”, en Carol Moder y Aida Martinovic-Zic (eds.), Discourse Across Languages and Cultures, Amsterdam, John Benjamins, 2004, pp. 195-210.
Talmy, Leonard, “Lexical Typologies”, en Timothy Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. III: Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2007, pp. 66-168.
