Vol. 80 (2020): Español
Artículos

Español

PDF (Spanish) HTML (Spanish)
  • Español Español
Español Español
Español

Published 2020-12-31

Keywords

  • Español

How to Cite

Español. (2020). Dimensión Antropológica, 80, 89-116. https://revistas.inah.gob.mx/index.php/dimension/article/view/17638

Abstract

A contrast is established between the general notion of “time” and that of “linguistic time” in the framework of the hypothesis of linguistic relativism. Grammatical constructions of different indigenous Mexican languages are presented to illustrate different forms and values of tense conjugation. Some reflections on the relationship that may exist between verbal time and the history of indigenous peoples are proposed.

PDF (Spanish) HTML (Spanish)

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bybee, Joan L., Revere Perkins y William Pagliuca, The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1994.
  2. Comrie, Bernard, Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1976.
  3. ____________, Tense, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1985.
  4. De Wolf, Paul P., Diccionario español-náhuatl, México, UNAM / Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur / Fideicomiso Teixidor, 2003.
  5. Duranti, Alessandro, Antropología lingüística, Pedro Tena (trad.), Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  6. Erickson de Hollenbach, Elena, “Los pronombres honoríficos del mixteco: reflejo de la historia social del pueblo mixteco”, Cuadernos del Sur, año 9, núm. 19, Oaxaca, Oaxaca, agosto de 2003, pp. 51-58.
  7. Faudree, Paja y Magnus Pharao Hansen, “Language, Society, and History. Towards a Unified Approach?”, N. J. Enfield, Paul Kockelman y Jack Sidnell (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Linguistic Anthropology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 2014, pp. 227-249.
  8. Inoue, Miyako, “What does Language Remember? Indexical Inversion and the Naturalized History of Japanese Women”, en Bambi B. Schieffelin y Paul B. Garrett (eds.), Anthropological Linguistics. Critical Concepts in Language Studies, vol. III: Talking About Language, Londres / Nueva York, Routledge, 2011, pp. 212-235.
  9. Li, Peggy, “Trekking through Space with Whorf: Language and Spatial Cognition”, tesis de doctorado, University of Pennsylvania, Filadelfia, 2002.
  10. Lucy, John A., Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992a.
  11. ____________, Grammatical Categories and Cognition: A Case Study of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992b.
  12. Melchuk, Igor A., “Tres rasgos fundamentales, siete principios básicos y once resultados muy importantes de la investigación morfológica de Roman Jakobson”, en Roman Jakobson (autor) y Krystyna Pomorska y Stephen Rudy (comps.), Arte verbal, signo verbal, tiempo verbal, 1a reimp. de la 1a ed. en español, México, FCE, 1995, pp. 241-268.
  13. Mithun, Marianne, “The Value of Linguistic Diversity: Viewing Others’ Worlds through North American Indian Languages”, Alessandro Duranti (ed.), A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing, 2004, pp. 121-140.
  14. Rázuri Martínez, Ada Rosana, “Los pronombres personales del mixteco: un estudio comparativo entre dos variantes lingüísticas”, tesis de licenciatura en lingüística, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos, Lima, 2016.
  15. Sapir, Edward, El lenguaje: introducción al estudio del habla, México, FCE, 1954.
  16. Seydel, Ute, “La constitución de la memoria cultural”, Acta Poética, vol. 35, núm. 2, México, julio-diciembre de 2014, pp. 187-214.
  17. Suárez, Jorge A., Mesoamerican Indian Languages, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1983.
  18. Whorf, Benjamin Lee, Lenguaje, pensamiento y realidad, Barcelona, Barral, 1971.